Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Ann Surg ; 275(5): 933-939, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1883081

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified CAL-WR. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of segmental colectomy in patients with endoscopically unresectable colonic lesions results in significant morbidity and mortality. CAL-WR is an alternative procedure that may reduce morbidity. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study was performed in 13 Dutch hospitals between January 2017 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were (1) colonic lesions inaccessible using current endoscopic resection techniques (judged by an expert panel), (2) non-lifting residual/recurrent adenomatous tissue after previous polypectomy or (3) an undetermined resection margin after endoscopic removal of a low-risk pathological T1 (pT1) colon carcinoma. Thirty-day morbidity, technical success rate and radicality were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 118 patients included (56% male, mean age 66 years, standard deviation ± 8 years), 66 (56%) had complex lesions unsuitable for endoscopic removal, 34 (29%) had non-lifting residual/recurrent adenoma after previous polypectomy and 18 (15%) had uncertain resection margins after polypectomy of a pT1 colon carcinoma. CAL-WR was technically successful in 93% and R0 resection was achieved in 91% of patients. Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo i-ii) were noted in 7 patients (6%) and an additional oncologic segmental resection was performed in 12 cases (11%). Residual tissue at the scar was observed in 5% of patients during endoscopic follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CAL-WR is an effective, organ-preserving approach that results in minor complications and circumvents the need for major surgery. CAL-WR, therefore, deserves consideration when endoscopic excision of circumscribed lesions is impossible or incomplete.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Carcinoma , Colonic Neoplasms , Colonic Polyps , Laparoscopy , Aged , Carcinoma/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Margins of Excision , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
2.
Anticancer Res ; 42(3): 1653-1657, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1716348

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, pedicle flaps instead of free flap transfer were recommended for head and neck reconstruction to reduce infection risk. Boron neutron-capture therapy in Japan was clinically approved in 2020 as a salvage radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy. The efficacy and safety of salvage surgery following boron neutron-capture therapy remain unclear. CASE REPORT: We describe a 57-year-old male with crT4aN0M0 oral cancer after three different forms of radiotherapy including boron neutron-capture therapy, treated by salvage partial maxillectomy with both buccal fat pad and nasoseptal flaps. His postsurgical course was successful, without tracheostomy, and he had no Clavien- Dindo grade 3 or 4 complications. The pathological diagnosis was T4a squamous cell carcinoma with a negative surgical margin. No recurrence or metastasis had occurred at 113 days postoperatively. No opioid consumption was needed postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Pathological negative margins were achieved in this case and there were no severe complications. Further accrual of cases salvage surgery following boron neutron-capture therapy is required to clarify treatment strategies for recurrent head and neck cancer.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Salvage Therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery , Boron Neutron Capture Therapy , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , SARS-CoV-2 , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy , Surgical Flaps , Treatment Outcome
3.
Surg Today ; 51(3): 447-451, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1453756

ABSTRACT

Accumulation of experience and advances in techniques and instruments have enabled surgeons to perform video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) safely for sublobar resection, including segmentectomy and wedge resection. A key to successful VATS sublobar resection is to have adequate resection margins and the appropriate use of articulated surgical staplers is essential for this purpose. The SigniaTM stapling system (Covidien Japan, Tokyo) has been used extensively in the fields of thoracic surgery. Its features include high maneuverability with fully powered articulation, rotation, clamping, and firing, which the surgeon can control with one hand. We introduce the "sliding technique" using the SigniaTM system, which allows for adjustment of the resection lines of the pulmonary parenchyma to optimize safe surgical margins with minimal stapler movement, and without repetitively moving the stapler in and out of the pleural cavity, during VATS sublobar resection.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung/surgery , Margins of Excision , Pneumonectomy/instrumentation , Pneumonectomy/methods , Surgical Staplers , Surgical Stapling/instrumentation , Surgical Stapling/methods , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/instrumentation , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/methods , Humans , Safety
4.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(8): 1913-1919, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1213212

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: On October 15th, 2020, the first Surgical National Consensus Conference on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was promoted by the Italian Association of Breast Surgeons (ANISC). METHOD: The Consensus Conference was entirely held online due to anti-Covid-19 restrictions and after an introductory four lectures held by national and international experts in the field, a total of nine questions were presented and a digital "real-time" voting system was obtained. A consensus was reached if 75% or more of all panelists agreed on a given question. RESULTS: A total of 202 physicians, from 76 different Italian Breast Centers homogeneously distributed throughout the Italian country, participated to the Conference. Most participants were surgeons (75%). Consensus was reached for seven out of the nine considered topics, including management of margins and lymph nodes at surgery, and there was good correspondence between the 32 "Expert Panelists" and the "Participants" to the Conference. Consensus was not achieved regarding the indications to NACT for high-grade luminal-like breast tumors, and the need to perform an axillary lymph node dissection in case of micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node after NACT. CONCLUSIONS: NACT is a topic of major interest among surgeons, and there is need to develop shared guidelines. While a Consensus was obtained for most issues presented at this Conference, controversies still exist regarding indications to NACT in luminal B-like tumors and management of lymph node micrometastases. There is need for clinical studies and analysis of large databases to improve our knowledge on this subject.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Italy , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphatic Metastasis , Margins of Excision , Mastectomy , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Micrometastasis/therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Selection , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Tumor Burden
5.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(11)2020 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-949262

ABSTRACT

Primary leiomyosarcoma of the breast is an extremely rare neoplasm accounting for less than 0.0006% of all breast malignancies, with fewer than 80 cases reported in the literature to date. Here, we present a case of leiomyosarcoma of the breast in a 61-year-old woman without traditional risk factors. This case was treated with lumpectomy requiring wide margins due to the high rate of local recurrence. A planned breast reduction surgery was deemed adequate postlumpectomy therapy to prevent cancer recurrence, negating the need for chemotherapy or radiation therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which cosmetic breast reduction surgery will be used as postlumpectomy cancer recurrence risk mitigation for primary leiomyosarcoma of the breast. Patients with this malignancy have a relatively poor prognosis compared with other breast cancer types, with a 5-year disease-free survival of 33%-52%. As such, frequent follow-up and monitoring for postresection recurrence is essential.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast/surgery , Leiomyosarcoma/surgery , Mammaplasty , Mastectomy, Segmental , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Leiomyosarcoma/diagnostic imaging , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL